@article{oai:kyukyo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000393,
 author = {黄, 春玉},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {九州共立大学研究紀要 = Study journal of Kyushu Kyoritsu University},
 month = {},
 note = {This article explores the transitivity of Chinese and Japanese from the perspective of construction
grammar. The transitivity of Chinese and Japanese differ but in both languages, the constructional
meanings are extendable. Existential sentences can be extended to possessive sentences, and possessive
sentences can be extended to transitive sentences. The sentence elements are also extendable, and
this extension interacts with constructional meaning. The route of meaning extension is usually from
concrete to abstract, from dynamic to static, from cause to result. Constructional meaning constrains its
constituent elements, for example, existential sentence constrains quantifiers and adverbial elements,
while static sentence constrains the agent. In the construction, the meaning of the constituent elements
can achieve the meaning extension from transitivity to automatism.},
 pages = {41--46},
 title = {構文の他動性に関する認知分析 : 中日言語対照の立場で},
 volume = {10},
 year = {2020}
}